Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Free Essays on In Search For The First Americans

In Search of the First Americans -Vaughn M. Bryant, Jr. â€Å"When did the first humans really arrive in the Americas?† According to the article the bones found in the Folsom site are indisputably the oldest evidence of humans. The search for older sites and evidence subdued due to the wide acceptance of the Folsom site. The site was a perfect fit for the guidelines of even qualifying to be a specific archeological site, whereas most others couldn’t even meet one. Evidently in the 1950’s Clovis was uncovered. A dent type stone spear point was found among mammoth bones in deposits directly underneath extinct bison bones containing Folsom spear points. These new points were call Clovis points. The discovery of the Clovis points pushed back the existence of humans to 11,500 years ago. There has been many searches to try and discover older evidence of humans, some have been found, two in particular. These two sites that are found in the artic have suggested human existence over 27,000 years ago. The author believes that there are older and better site out there and that new sites are just waiting to be found. Time will unveil new sites and it is then when we will have a better understanding of how old our existence is. The author says that we cannot settle on the information given to us, that scientists cannot â€Å"foresee† the future. We have a lot to learn and to accomplish in our lifetimes. The author also states that we need more proof when determining the age of human existence. The article discusses the excavation of many sites to find evidence of older bones and tool of our ancestors. This is a form of anthropology, it is called archeology. There are a lot of scientists involved in the research of the age of human existence and a large majority of them are anthropologists, in on form or another.... Free Essays on In Search For The First Americans Free Essays on In Search For The First Americans In Search of the First Americans -Vaughn M. Bryant, Jr. â€Å"When did the first humans really arrive in the Americas?† According to the article the bones found in the Folsom site are indisputably the oldest evidence of humans. The search for older sites and evidence subdued due to the wide acceptance of the Folsom site. The site was a perfect fit for the guidelines of even qualifying to be a specific archeological site, whereas most others couldn’t even meet one. Evidently in the 1950’s Clovis was uncovered. A dent type stone spear point was found among mammoth bones in deposits directly underneath extinct bison bones containing Folsom spear points. These new points were call Clovis points. The discovery of the Clovis points pushed back the existence of humans to 11,500 years ago. There has been many searches to try and discover older evidence of humans, some have been found, two in particular. These two sites that are found in the artic have suggested human existence over 27,000 years ago. The author believes that there are older and better site out there and that new sites are just waiting to be found. Time will unveil new sites and it is then when we will have a better understanding of how old our existence is. The author says that we cannot settle on the information given to us, that scientists cannot â€Å"foresee† the future. We have a lot to learn and to accomplish in our lifetimes. The author also states that we need more proof when determining the age of human existence. The article discusses the excavation of many sites to find evidence of older bones and tool of our ancestors. This is a form of anthropology, it is called archeology. There are a lot of scientists involved in the research of the age of human existence and a large majority of them are anthropologists, in on form or another....

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Colonies of the New World essays

Colonies of the New World essays The early colonies whether they were one of the Middle, New England, or Southern, they knew they needed a central government. The southern colonies had a certain way of handling their lives. Their way of life sometimes did not agree with the other colonies so they did things differently. They relied mostly on slave labor while the other colonies did not. Their economy was based on tobacco. The social structure went as follows The Southern Colonies were larger and more spread out than the other two colonies so they held county organizations rather than town meetings due to the distance. They had County judges and sheriffs who ran the local governments. That was the governmental difference between the southern colony and its Middle and New England counterparts. All three colonies had a royal governor, with an appointed council, and an elected assembly. This showed that the colonies often differed in their approach but in the end they always had the same beginning format. The economy of the Southern colonies consisted of plantations and various-sized farms that were widely separated and grew key staple crops. These plantations and farms were mostly operated using indentured servants or slaves. This colony had a one-crop economy that did well when the weather was favorable. But Mother Nature was not always kind to the settlers and when the conditions changed for the worse the colony suffered greatly. This meant that the Southern colonies were more dependent on England and the generosity of other colonies for manufactured goods and other food items. Tobacco, Rice, and Indigo were the main crops in selective states. Waterways provided the main form of transportation since there were many rivers in that area. While the Puritanism was rampant ion the New England Colonies, Anglicanism was the established Episcopal Church, though in Maryland there was a large minority of Catholics. Like the Middle colonies the Southern colonies pract ...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Finance Growth Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Finance Growth - Essay Example Such decisions consist of allocation of the resources of the firms with carefully laid out plans to recoup the initial investment as well as adequate returns in the form of cash flows or other benefits that are expected to be generated during the economic life of the asset or investment. It is hard to reverse such capital budgeting decisions without severely disturbing an organization economically or in any other manner. Therefore it becomes critically important for any firm to make its capital budgeting decisions after a systematic and careful analysis of all associated risks and issues. But it must be noted that the capital budgeting decisions are many sided analysis. The process of this analysis involves estimation and forecasting of the current and future cash flows and the economic evaluation of alternative projects on hand. "Since in reality the cash flow estimations take place in a non-deterministic environment, full of complex interplay of conflicting forces, an exact descrip tion about cash flows is virtually impossible"(Chandra Prakash Gupta). Therefore it becomes important that the firm attempts to develop procedures and techniques that help the firm to make a meaningful analysis and evaluation of all the alternatives available in its hands before any decision is taken to invest money in any of the projects. This also makes the decisions of capital budgeting risky and difficult to retrieve. Capital budgeting is primarily concerned with fairly large investments in long-term assets. The assets may be tangible like property, plan, and equipment or intangible like new technology, patents, or trademarks. Irrespective of the nature of the assets, the capital expenditures have two characters; one is that they are meant to be a long term investment and secondly their benefits or cash flows are expected to be spread over many years. These characteristic features make the capital expenditure decisions very important for a firm. The capital expenditure decisions since have a considerable impact on the organization's future cash flows there is a considerable